Kent Hack Enough 2015

Originally published in the Diary of HackSU on

by Paul Dilyard and Robin Bonatesta, Kent State University


Kent Hack Enough started in 2012, with a group of about 20 friends in the Math and Computer Science building at Kent State University. Since then, we have grown to over 250 attendees in 2015 (we have as many volunteers now as there were hackers at the first event!). Robin Bonatesta and I (Paul Dilyard) took over leadership of our CS student org (HacKSU), and therefore the organization of KHE, in Spring 2014. We have been able to take the foundations of awesomeness that the original leaders left us, and expand them to a level we are really proud of.

This post is a recap of our experiences organizing what turned out to be a really successful event: Kent Hack Enough 2015. We hope this article is useful for future KHE organizers, anyone looking to organize a small-to-medium sized event, and the hackathon community as a whole. We’ll take you through all the different components that go into a hackathon, including volunteer teams, finances, sponsorship, marketing, statistics from the event, and more.


Something we wanted to improve from last year was the level of involvement from volunteers. Last year, pretty much all the planning was done by Robin and I, and we had far too many sleepless nights. We did have an excellent experience with our volunteers day-of, however.

Robin and I run HacKSU, a student organization at Kent State that is responsible for Kent Hack Enough. We took over as co-leaders in Fall 2014, and have been working on growing the org ever since. The member-base consists of about 60 people at our weekly meetings (where we teach people to code from the beginning to the advanced), 20 of which are die-hard, committed people we can count on. Naturally, this is where we pulled our volunteers from. We ended up with 23 total volunteers; some were more involved during the planning stage, and some were more involved day-of (we definitely needed both).

We initially created a team structure, each team with a team leader. The team leaders would have to go through Robin and I for budgetary decisions, but other than that, teams had a lot of freedom. Here’s a list of all the teams we set up:

  • Marketing (social media, plastering posters, recruiting other schools, etc.)
  • Travel (answered travel reimbursement requests, organized busses)
  • Food (planned meals, snacks, etc.)
  • Development (mobile apps)
  • The Frat (big ideas team)

Some of these teams’ responsibilities are more obvious than others.

Development team

I was responsible for the main website, as well as the staff backend, while the other members of the development team worked on apps for iOS, Android, and Windows Phone. No hackathon really needs apps, but I think it’s key to let people get involved where they want to be involved. We had volunteers that were interested in creating apps, and it was a learning process for everyone. And learning is what hackathons are about.

The Frat

We got the idea for this team from the awesome organizers of HackIllinois 2014 and their Moonshots team. They were responsible for making our attendees have fun, which we think is a really important aspect to KHE. We gave them the freedom to do anything they could think of that would add to the overall experience of the event. This team thought of and implemented ideas such as the FooBar (a non-alcoholic open bar serving mixed drinks based on Red Bull), and the Freshman 15 (a series of 15 workshops for beginner hackers).

In the end, The Frat moved towards a more project-based structure, with some members focusing on the FooBar and other members focusing on the Freshman 15.

Team-wise, anything financial (sponsorship, budget, etc.) was left solely to the lead organizers: Robin and I.

Finance, budget, and sponsors

First, a little background about our bank account. We use a business checking account with Huntington National Bank for our student organization (HacKSU). We use this account for all expenses related to HacKSU, including Kent Hack Enough. As an official student org, we have the option of using a university supplied and managed bank account. The previous leaders and founders of HacKSU had already decided not to go down this route, and for good reason: university accounts tend not to give you enough control (or haste). We already know how hard it can be to deal with administration, and luckily, we don’t have to when it comes to money. I know many hackathons don’t have this option, but we’ve been blessed with our own bank account.

We do, however, have to go through the university for one of our sponsors, the Knight Foundation. They are only able to get money to us by first issuing a check to the KSU Foundation, who is then able to release the funds to HacKSU through reimbursement. However, reimbursement isn’t good enough for us. We need that sponsorship money before the event, or it won’t be able to be utilized(it’s $5,000). Last year, KHE was in October 2014, but we didn’t get this money until January 2015. Through a series of blunt phone calls and emails to a contact in the KSU Foundation, I was able to convince administration that this was unacceptable and unnecessary, and we were able to submit our budget instead of our receipts. The check was in my hands about a week-and-a-half before the event. This might give you an idea of why we like to manage our own funds.

The numbers

As we grow, so does our budget. This year, we budgeted for about $24,000, with the sponsorship goal of $30,000 in mind. We always try to leave about $3,000 extra in the bank every year to fund our student organization. We also tend to be extremely conservative when making the budget, so in both 2014 and 2015 we’ve come in well under budget. Here’s a breakdown of what we budgeted for and what we actually spent:

(Format = Category: $Budgeted, $Spent)

Meals: $7300, $7223.85
Snacks: $700, $500.02
Drinks: $1000, $632.47
Foo Bar: $1100, $674.10

Utensils: $300, $389.40
Misc: $200, $69.96

Reimbursement: $1000, ~$800
Buses: $3000, $1200

Shirts: $4000, $4128
Wristbands: $300, $154.70
Custom playing cards: $200, $160.39
Stickers: $200, $187.00
Custom branded cups: $0, $600
Cinch bags: $0, $539.00
Volunteer shirts: $500, $738.61

First: $2000, $2000
Second: $1000, $1000
Third: $500, $500

This is not the complete budget, nor is it fully up to date (I’m writing this only one day after the event, so all day-of expenses have not yet been accounted for). Inevitably, every single purchase made for the hackathon has been logged for our records. I’ll try to come back and update this post with the final numbers, but these should give you the general idea of what we spent.

Achieving our sponsorship goals

We were really fortunate to raise our goal of $30,000 this year. This may not seem like a huge goal for a hackathon, but being in Northeast Ohio, there are not a lot of tech companies or companies in general that really get it. A lot of the companies in our area are more traditional and still would rather pay to attend the career fair than a hackathon. To combat this, we built asponsorship packet that we hoped would encourage some of our longer term supports to step up one level of sponsorship. This didn’t work quite as well as we hoped; most of our returning sponsors stuck to the same level as they have had in the past. This year we also built in a Start Up tier, as Cleveland and Akron have a growing start up community, where young, small companies could still afford to be involved for cheaper. While this worked in a few cases, some of our older supporters decided to choose this tier, event though they were not start ups.

Fortunately, this year we were able to gain 9 new companies (about half of our sponsors). Many of these came to us directly because they had heard about previous events or alumni had begun working there. A few other relationships had been formed through our student organization. Companies contact us all year long about recruiting our members for internships and full time jobs. We began agreeing to spread the word once, but if they wanted to recruit from HacKSU again, they would have to support Kent Hack Enough. This was really successful. As mentioned above, we also want to really improve the diversity of majors at the event, so Robin joined the Visual Communication Design group on Facebook and reached out to companies trying to recruit designers there. This was also fairly successful.

Next, we found career fair directories from local schools like Case Western, and OSU, and we attended our own career fair. The career fair directories from OSU and CWRU had the emails of recruiters we were looking to talk to, and since CWRU and OSU have larger, more reputable CS/Engineering schools, they have better, cooler companies at their fairs. We contacted these companies explaining that hackathons were a much better way to recruit and market your company to students that are talented and passionate. This worked, but not as well as we expected. As mentioned above, most of the companies in our area would rather attend the career fair because it’s seen as less risky and more traditional.

The last thing we did to recruit more companies was to do a ton of research on companies in Northeast Ohio. We searched for the best companies to work for in the region and in specific cities (Akron, Cleveland, Columbus). We also searched for lists of startups or start up communities in these regions. We found many companies that we had never heard of — that no college students really knew about. If they were hiring interns or full time positions, we contacted them and told them that if the leaders of the student organizations did not know who they were, they were not recruiting successfully. This was our most successful form of new company recruiting.

When recruiting new companies, we want to ensure all first year sponsors have a great experience. Depending on how negotiation goes, we usually give first time sponsors one extra benefit from a tier above the one they’ve chosen. The most common example of this was new sponsors choosing the Jack Tier, for $1000, and us giving them the resume book after the event, which is only included in the Queen Tier.

In conclusion, here are the final numbers of sponsorship we received:

Sponsor breakdown

Ace Sponsors $5,000 each * 1: $5,000 (16%)
King Sponsors $3,000 each * 2: $6,000 (20%)
Queen Sponsors $2,000 each *5: $10,000 (33%)
Jack Sponsors $1,000 each *6: $6,000 (20%)
Startup Sponsors $500 each * 4: $2,000 (6%)
Custom Sponsors (custom) * 2: $1,550 (5%)
Total: $30,550
Note: Prize sponsors are not included in this breakdown


In 2014, we used Eventbrite for event registration, check-in, and mass emails, and Google Drive for pretty much everything else. A lot of hackathons use tools built by a smattering of startups and large companies. After having the experience of organizing my first hackathon, I had a pretty strong idea of what I wanted for 2015: purpose-built software (after all, we’re hackers too!).

I started building a management tool for KHE back in February 2015. The tech looks like this: an API that serves content to several different front-ends: the main attendee website, the staff-accessible management site, and the mobile apps.

The system has 9 primary features: statistics, attendee management, check-in, mass emails, ticketing, live updates, scheduling, URL shortening, and export tools.


Stats are always fun. The website has a dashboard that shows us some basic numbers like registrations/month, shirt size distribution, dietary restrictions, gender distribution, as well as what schools people are coming from.


Attendee Management

As applications come in, we need a way to review them, accept/waitlist/deny people, and view specific information about them. This feature is basically just a searchable and filterable dump of all the registrations. I also built a little equation that estimated the number of attendees that will actually show up (which, as you can see, needs some adjustment).

Attendee Management

Check In

During check-in on the first day of the event, we needed an easy way to quickly find hackers, verify their phone numbers, and mark their attendance. The check-in screen met that need really nicely. It also has a way to quickly register any walk-up attendees. Finally, it all updates with web sockets (as does the rest of the API), so our volunteers working the check-in tables never had to refresh the page to see each others’ changes or to get a live count of numbers.

Check-in system


Ticketing systems can get really complicated, so I just kept mine simple and without too many features. This has a lot of room for improvement, but it was better than having an inbox full of emails.

TIcketing system

Live Updates

We wanted to be able to send out push notifications during the event to mobile devices and web browsers. A simple messaging system did the trick.

Live update management
The attendee view of the live feed


This feature allowed us to easily update the schedule without changing HTML on the main website. This part of the site could also use some cleanup.

Schedule management
The attendee view of the schedule

Mass emails

We’re using the SendGrid API to push out emails to certain attendees based on given parameters. The KHE API builds Markdown, saves the email to our database for the records, and then pushes it to SendGrid.

Sending an email to all approved hackers

The last couple of features are pretty simple, so I won’t include screenshots. The URL shortener allows us to use pretty and branded URLs for links to things like the sponsorship packet, table assignment Google Doc, and more. It resolves URLs at[MY_SHORT_URL]. Lastly, there are tools for downloading a CSV of every single application (useful for sharing with other people and for our on-site security), and for downloading a zip file of all the resumes that got uploaded.

Overall, I’m really happy with how the custom-built tools worked for us. I have a lot of ideas for improvement, and I would love to see what the community could come up with too. All the code is open-source and available here:

API (docs in wiki):
Public front-end:
Staff front-end:
Android app:

I’m happy to share the code for these projects and I hope other hackathons find use in them. If you do decide to use the code, I have three favors to ask of you:

  1. Please give some sort of credit or shout-out to Kent Hack Enough. We love our hackathon and put a lot of work into it, so just respect that.
  2. Please contribute back to the main project (Fork and Pull Request, make issues, etc.). There is a lot of room for improvement, so we’d love to see other hackathons getting involved.
  3. Please do not just steal the code and use it as your own. This project is open so the community can benefit, but the community doesn’t benefit if you take without giving back. (I don’t envision this as much of a problem in the hackathon world, but I put this here just to be safe).

Google Drive

We still use Google Drive a lot — it’s great for financials, simple docs, file sharing, and lots more. We gave each of our teams a folder to dump files, and we kept track of our financial data here (budget, invoices, etc.). It was never our intention to leave or replace Drive (that’s pointless), as there really isn’t anything better for sharing documents.


We used Devpost for submitting hacks. I originally planned to roll our own solution for project submission (we had a really cool attendee voting system planned), but in the end, decided to go with Devpost simply because it’s such a widely used platform.

We figured Devpost would be reliable day-of, but as it turns out, we had the same problem a lot of hackathons have been having this year: we never saw a pretty good percentage of the hacks. As submissions started rolling in, we started pushing out table assignments for the expo. Almost immediately, several teams started coming up to us asking why they hadn’t been given a table number. They showed us that their project had indeed been submitted to the correct hackathon on Devpost — we definitely should have been able to see their hack listed, but we couldn’t. We did what we could to improvise on the spot, and we feel like we recovered the best we could. Our first place winner was actually was one of these affected teams. We are still heart broken however, that some teams felt like we had failed to give them a spot to show off what they built. One first-time team thought their project wasn’t good enough to be shown at the expo, and that is absolutely not the impression we wanted to give off. We think every hacker’s project is wonderful and everyone deserves the chance to show what they’ve built and learned.

After the hackathon, we reached out to Devpost asking about the problem. We were basically told that the problem came down to user error, and that they knew they needed to improve their user experience. However, we knowfor a fact that hackers had correctly submitted their projects to us (they showed us directly on their laptops), so the problem is definitely more than skin deep.

UPDATE: We’ve since spoken with Devpost employees to give further information and they’ve rolled out new features that should help with the UX problem of not submitting your project to a hackathon. Hopefully this helps.

Major League Hacking

MLH isn’t exactly a “tool”, but we had a similar experience with MLH as we did with Devpost. This season, we were one of the first hackathons to apply to be sanctioned. We quickly completed their required checklist, and we thought we were all set. Then, when the first version of the Fall Schedule came out, we were missing. We didn’t appear on the schedule for another two weeks. We even were the first hackathon to put the MLH banner on our website, which not a single hackathon on the schedule had done at the time. They did not enforce this rule with the larger hackathons, like PennApps or MHacks.

Not only this, but we started to get really frustrated with the set up of their calls. MLH has monthly calls with the organizers where they make sure you have your homework done. Seriously. They read a checklist of items and ask if you’ve completed them. Collegiate hackathons are built for students, by students, we don’t need to report to an outside company. We love our hackathon, and we have experience planning it; we don’t need to be babysat (we already had everything on their list completed anyway). At the very end of each monthly call, our MLH rep would then ask if there was anything MLH could do to help. The only thing we ever asked for was help with our social media — we were creating cool content and we wanted more of the hacker community to see it. MLH never retweeted anything unique about our event, like the FooBar or the Freshmen 15. They only ever tweeted out a standard, boring register here kind of tweet. They didn’t take the time to understand what our event was about and help us spread the word.

On top of this, MLH scheduled Local Hack Day for the same weekend of Kent Hack Enough. It was not a huge deal, as we understand that there will have to be a conflict with something no matter what weekend they choose, and we were able to convince most of the local schools to come to Kent Hack Enough instead of hosting a LHD at their school. It did, however become an issue the day of the event. The same weekend, Swift went to HackNC, Nick Quinlin went to CalHacks, yet we were sent an MLH employee’s sibling… This person was great, we have no complaints about him. However, getting a non-employee did not make us feel like a priority to MLH. As a non-employee, he did not have access to some of the software for the hardware lab, and there was some weirdness there. He also didn’t have access to the Twitter account, so while we were having a great time in Kent, the hacker community largely did not know because MLH was too busy tweeting about HackNC, CalHacks, and Local Hack Day. Over the course of the weekend, MLH tweeted 15 times about HackNC or CalHacks, and only once about Kent Hack Enough.

After the event, we spent a lot of time compiling feedback for MLH in their post-event survey. We had a scheduled call with our MLH rep the next day, and after we listened to a terrible Mario meets Taylor Swift version of “Shake It Off” loop 3 times while on hold, no one ever joined the conference line. Our MLH rep also forgot about another one of our monthly calls earlier this summer.

We love Major League Hacking’s dedication to the hacker community, but we were disappointed when we got the feeling that MLH only cares about the big hackathon. We feel that MLH’s hand is reaching too far into the business of planning hackathons — they should be there to help us, not rule over us.

MLH isn’t helping anyone by sanctioning hundreds of events. If they can’t provide the same quality of support to every hackathon, they should stop sanctioning so many.

UPDATE: Even though we posted this story in HH well after midnight, Jon Gottfried and Mike Swift immediately got on a phone call with us to discuss. They clarified that our on-site MLH rep was, in fact, an employee of MLH, as well as a few other issues. They also let us know that they would love to hear this kind of feedback earlier in the process. Jon and Swift ensured us that they ❤ the small hackathon.


Obviously, Kent Hack Enough is a small hackathon in Northeast Ohio. Kent isn’t known for our CS Department, and we don’t even have a full engineering school. To reach our growth goals this year, we knew we’d have to go outside of Kent State University with our marketing.

One of our volunteers went completely above and beyond and did a ton of research in our area. He sent out over 400 unique emails to different university faculty, student organizations, and students. He also began reaching out to our regional campuses at Kent State, which is something we’d never done before. This volunteer was also the student that, early-on in the semester, plastered our posters all over the university, in every single building.

Social Media

We also strived to really improve our social media this year. We figured our Twitter and Facebook pages would be key tools to recruit students from other schools. We tried to improve this by creating more interesting content. This started with videos. We had a volunteer animate a handful of trailers that featured cool card motions. He also made a hilarious Shia Laboeuf video when that first came out. (See below — Plus the rest of our channel can be seen here.)

We also tried to create more interesting graphics for other posts promoting different initiatives like our foobar and the Freshmen 15. Some of these posts can be seen below.

Screen Shot 2015-11-30 at 1.56.44 PM
Screen Shot 2015-11-30 at 1.56.58 PM

Overall, our social media was really successful. We were able to raise our number of views on an average Facebook post from about 200 views or less to an average of 2,000 views, with most posts being between 1,000 to 6,000 views. We did this by obnoxiously sharing our posts to groups like HH Design, Hackathon Hackers, and Ladies Storm Hackathons. We also shared our posts around Kent State Facebook groups, and had our volunteers periodically like and comment on the posts to keep them relevant in these groups.

Screen Shot 2015-11-30 at 1.44.57 PMThe foobar

By far, our most successful post was when we announced the foobar. It may sound surprising, but this started as a health initiative after hearing horror stories of hackathons having to send attendees to the ER because of the unhealthy food and massive quantities of energy drinks. We wanted to create a way for people to enjoy energy drinks in a healthier, more controlled way. We thought about having a smoothie bar and forcing people to ingest fruits with the energy drinks, and eventually this turned into the foobar, where we took classic alcoholic drinks and replaced the alcohol with similar fruit juices and Red Bull.

People loved the wittiness of the name, and the names of the drinks and it sparked a lot of engagement because it was fairly controversial. Many people did not believe we would follow through, as some other hackathons have done in the past. People also did not understand initially that the drinks were nonalcoholic. This post reached over 6,000 people on Facebook and had 110 Likes, Comments, and Shares, as well at 981 Post Clicks. Interestingly, we also had an almost 5% spike in female registration after this post, but not when we announced our partnership with The Fashion School.

Attendee Statistics

We tried to collect as much information about our attendees as possible without making our application form too grueling. Overall, we’re pretty happy with our numbers, as we met our goal of 250 attendees.

The basic numbers

Total number of registrations: 864
Total number of RSVPs: 341
Total number of attendees: 258
Attendees/registrations: 29.8% (or a 70.2% churn rate)

Of those 258 attendees, 62 of them (24.0%) were walk-ins (meaning they had not registered on the website prior to the event). We only got about 30% of sign-ups to come to the event, which can probably be attributed to our budget for travel reimbursement and busses.

Gender distribution

Male: 82.6%
Female: 15.8%
Other: 1.4%

These numbers obviously aren’t the best, but we don’t feel they represent our efforts in this area. The entire idea behind our party branding is to make the event more approachable to all. We had the Freshmen 15 to encourage more diverse populations of students to try out a hackathon. We also partnered with The Fashion School and The School of Journalism and Mass Communication, which have two of the most diverse populations on campus. We had more females than ever help plan the event. We don’t have the statistics from last year, but this is definitely a priority for improvement in the future.

Hacker experience levels

108 (41.9%) of our attendees were first-time hackers. This is a number that we are extremely proud of. We strive to be a really welcoming environment for beginners, and we think this number directly reflects that effort.

108 (41.9%) of our attendees were Computer Science majors. We are really excited about the academic diversity of students we had at the event. KSU is does not have a large CS department, so we have to look elsewhere for a lot of attendees. These come from programs like Fashion, Architecture, Visual Communication Design, and more. We even had a Spanish major.

Lastly, here’s a breakdown of academic standing:
High School: 1.9%
Freshman: 10.1%
Sophomore: 15.9%
Junior: 20.5%
Senior: 22.5%
Grad Student: 7.4%

School representation

Our top three schools in attendance were Kent State University (34.5%),Ohio State University (5.8%), and Youngstown State University (7.0%). It is important to note that we only collected emergency contact information from walk-in attendees, so we don’t know a lot of detailed statistics about them. However, it is safe to guess that well over half of the walk-ins were from Kent State, so the 34.5% number is probably a lot higher in reality.

Areas for improvement

While we do believe that KHE was a huge success this year, we also know that there is always lots of room for improvement.

Project Expo

One thing we really wanted to improve is the project expo. So far, the science fair style is the best thing the hackathon community has to offer, but we feel that it still relies on a lot of luck and presentation ability. We try to pick judges that can see past the presentation and judge the hack for what it is, but it can be difficult sometimes. Unfortunately, we weren’t able to come up with a better idea than a science fair. We did have plans for a way that attendees could judge each other with an app (we had a whole algorithm written), but we ditched the idea because it started to become logistically impossible. We’re still looking for ideas in this area.


While we’re really proud of the number of first time hackers and the diversity of majors, we know that we have a responsibility to improve in other areas (as mentioned above) and we plan to continue our efforts towards this challenge.


We’re incredibly proud of what we’ve been able to do with Kent Hack Enough in the course of two years. In this time we’ve raised attendance from 75 people to over 250. We believe we’re making a difference in the tech scene in our region of Northeast Ohio, and we can’t wait to see how Kent Hack Enough continues to grow in the future.

Just Make It

Students forged new collaborations and learned how to connect their disciplines with fashion and tech at the University Innovation Fellows Kent State Regional Meetup.

Sami Glass, Paul Dilyard and Ryan Phillips show off their creations on the runway at the University Innovation Fellows Kent State Regional Meetup. Photo by Laurie Moore.

Sami Glass, Paul Dilyard and Ryan Phillips show off their creations on the runway at the University Innovation Fellows Kent State Regional Meetup. Photo by Laurie Moore.

By Laurie Moore

At the end of the fashion show, after the music was turned off and the lights were dimmed, the designers discussed the creation process.

“I had to think in 3D. Actually, 4D: how something changes over time.”

“It was terrifying to think of cutting the uncut fabric. I had to have faith that it was going to be ok.”

“I kept hoping that the backstitch was going to undo. It did the opposite!”

If this doesn’t sound like what professional fashion designers would say, it’s for good reason. The designers here were students from different backgrounds who came together for a daylong wearables makeathon at Kent State University.

On November 6-8, 2015, Kent State hosted a University Innovation Fellows Regional Meetup, which was designed and hosted by Fellows and their faculty sponsors and mentors. Attendees included Kent State students as well as Fellows from the University of Minnesota, the University of Delaware, the University of Oklahoma, Kent State’s main campus and the Kent State University at Stark campus.

This event was an opportunity for students to explore the connections between their disciplines and the world of fashion, design and technology to create new human-centered innovations.

Fellows take part in a warm-up exercise during the Kent State Meetup. Photo by Laurie Moore.

Fellows take part in a warm-up exercise during the Kent State Meetup. Photo by Laurie Moore.

The event began on November 6 with a ribbon cutting to officially open The Fridge, a co-working space at the library created by University Innovation Fellows Robin Bonatesta and Paul Dilyard. The space is unique for a library; the door is always open, noise limits do not exist, and students from all majors are welcome.

“The Fridge is a symbol of the movements that are starting in this community of makers and entrepreneurs,” Bonatesta said. The space, she explained, is an experiment to provide a place where students can meet and collaborate on projects that span different disciplines. There are no set schedules, no permanent faculty or staff, and no rules about what students can do there. “I would love to see it be more widely used by different majors who are building collaborative projects,” she said.

James Bracken, Dean of the Kent State Libraries, spoke to the attendees during the ribbon cutting ceremony. During the last decades, he has seen the libraries evolve from only providing a books and resources to providing a combination of space, collections and services.

“The newest model in libraries is to have group study rooms like the one over there,” he said, gesturing to a door across the room. “What’s wrong with that picture? The door is shut. How many students are in there? One. The Fridge offers a model that turns this on its head.”

Kent State Fellows launched The Fridge, a co-working space in the library. Photo by Ryan Phillips.

Kent State Fellows launched The Fridge, a co-working space in the library. Photo by Ryan Phillips.

Julie Messing, Executive Director for Entrepreneurship Initiatives at Kent State, and University Innovation Fellows leaders Humera Fasihuddin and Leticia Britos Cavagnaro also spoke at the ceremony about the leadership of students in developing this space.

To experience the open and collaborative nature of The Fridge, the participants took part in a design thinking challenge around the theme of the college advising and mentoring process.

On Saturday, November 7, the event moved to the other side of the Kent State campus to the Fashion School’s Tech Style LAB. Participants explored the lab, which combines traditional fashion design methods with high-tech design equipment such as laser cutters and weaving machines. A machine that looked like a paper printer was revealed to be a fabric printer when the school’s professor and director J.R. Campbell peeled a printed layer of delicate silk from paper backing, eliciting gasps from the group.

During the first half of the day, students learned how to drape fabric, sew, use the laser cutting machine, and program arduinos. The second half of the day, they were presented with the challenge of designing a wearable — whether it was a piece of clothing or an accessory, high- or low-tech — that was connected to their majors or areas of interest.

For the students, the majority of whom had no experience with fashion, this opportunity to design and implement a project in under five hours was a unique one, especially considering that many had just learned to sew that morning.

Kevin Wolfgang, manager of the Tech Style LAB, explains how the knitting machine works. Photo by Laurie Moore.

Kevin Wolfgang, manager of the Tech Style LAB, explains how the knitting machine works. Photo by Laurie Moore.

Kevin Wolfgang, the Tech Style LAB manager, who guided the participants through the day’s activities, said that this constraint was intentional. “You have to shut your brain off to get something made. If you second guess all of your decisions, you get nothing done,” he said.

The main constraint was not the time limit alone, but the knowledge that at 9 pm that night, every single person had to walk down the runway to showcase what they’d made. Their creations had to look like something, they had to tell a story, and they couldn’t fall apart.

When Wolfgang turned on the lights and cued up the music at the end of the make-a-thon, it was show time.

Josh Halverson, a mechanical engineering major from the University of Minnesota, walked the runway to showcase a piece of wearable technology that he created. He said he was inspired by his mother, who recently recovered from cancer. When creating his wearable, Halverson imagined a patient in a doctor’s office who had just received very good or bad news and who, as a result, might not be in a state of mind to remember the doctor’s advice. To solve this challenge, his device records sound when a user’s heart rate increases or decreases significantly in parallel with the patient’s emotional state. The user would be able to listen to the recording at a later time.

Fellow Josh Halverson from the University of Minnesota displays his wearable on the runway. Photo by Laurie Moore.

Fellow Josh Halverson from the University of Minnesota displays his wearable on the runway. Photo by Laurie Moore.

Zachary Jones, and entrepreneurship major from the University of Delaware, started the day by creating magnetized shoelaces, but he pivoted mid-day and designed a maroon scarf instead. He compared the creation of the scarf to painting, which he does as a hobby. “Usually, when I paint, I put something down and see where it goes from there. With this, you really have to start with the end in mind, which was a great takeaway for me,” he said.

Sami Glass, a computer science major from the Kent State Stark campus, designed a lined green fabric purse. She reported some challenges with the sewing process: “You have to sew. You can’t just poke holes.” She laughed as she recalled finishing the stitches on a large piece of the purse only to realize there wasn’t thread in the sewing machine bobbin.

For the attendees, many of whom were not familiar with fashion design, the creation process was unfamiliar but rewarding in the end.

“When you’re writing a program, it’s very linear,” said Ryan Phillips, a Fellow and alumnus of Oklahoma State University who now works at Microsoft. Phillips, who also ran the design thinking challenge the previous night, created a sock for an infant that monitors vital signs that can be accessed via a parent or doctor’s smart phone. “When I was creating the sock, it looked nothing like it should have. And I just did this one seam and boom, it came together. Having that ability to conceptualize it when it doesn’t look anything like itself was different for me.”

University Innovation Fellows Kent State University Regional Meetup

The runway show wasn’t the end of the event. On Sunday morning, participants gathered at the MuseLab at Kent State’s library to create a museum exhibition for their creations. This third step required them to help others understand the story of their creations without being there to explain the meaning. The students were assisted by Kiersten Latham, professor and director of the MuseLab, and three of her graduate students in museum studies. Students were challenged to tell the story of their piece using only their display and a small card. They were given an hour, a wall-length glass case and a room of museum display supplies including mannequins, pedestals, frames, signs and lights.

“There’s so much power in the display,” Zachary Jones said, after he had hung his scarf behind museum glass. “That is something I’ll take back to campus. We have an innovation and entrepreneurship showcase in April, but nobody sees what comes out of that. We could do something similar to what we did here.”

Participants create an exhibition of their work in the MuseLab. Photo by Laurie Moore.

Participants create an exhibition of their work in the MuseLab. Photo by Laurie Moore.

Several participants created items related to the medical field, and they worked on an exhibition that would combine all of their projects. Josh Halverson’s audio recording device joined other objects including Ryan Phillip’s smart sock.

“I really liked this format where we had the makeathon, the runway and then this exhibit culmination,” Halverson said. “I also learned about how to get different people working towards one common goal.”

Ella Zurawski, a Kent State fashion merchandising major, modeled a dress created by Kevin Wolfgang as well as a pair of elaborate laser cut glasses that she made. “This display step provided a way to think differently about what you had made,” she said “When you’re making it, you ask, ‘How can I make it better?’ It’s introspective. Then, when you’re trying to present it, you ask, ‘How can I make other people experience it too?’ It’s very different.”

Throughout the event, the students discussed the lessons and themes that were woven into the experience: the value of telling a story, connecting with others, trusting the process, and pushing ahead from concept to creation. They agreed that ideation process is important, but it’s just as vital to create, even if the result is not perfect.

As Wolfgang said as the group debriefed after the runway show, “At some point you just have to jump. If it’s right or wrong, works or doesn’t, it’s ok. Just keep dancing.”




A Weekend of Fashion and Creation

Sometimes you’ll make stuff that’s crap and people will applaud it, and sometimes you make something that you think is brilliant and no one cares. You just have to keep creating. — Kevin Wolfgang, Director of TechStyle Lab at Kent State

Originally posted by Zack Jones on

I had the pleasure of spending a weekend in the Kent State University Fashion TechStyle Lab with the University Innovation Fellows Program. As an entrepreneurship major, creation is something I’m strongly interested in, but physical making and hands-on work have never been in my skill set.

We were first given a tour of all the cool tech in the lab. There was a laser cutter, a weaving machine, a body scanner, and a 3d printer, to name a few. Then, there was a demo time for us to learn basic skills that we might need during the makeathon. I chose to learn how use Adobe illustrator for the laser cutter and the basics of arduino. Next, we were sent off to create anything wearable.

My Arduino set up and ready to blink an LED

After fumbling around trying to make magnetic shoelaces for about 2 hours, I pivoted to making a scarf. This is when the magic happened. I looked at this clean piece of fabric and tried to picture the end product. This was the toughest part. I had to think not in three dimensions, but FOUR! How can anything be conceived like this? Not only did the piece have three physical dimensions, but I had to envision what it would look like after I flipped it inside out and factored in this motion associated with the time dimension!

Luckily, the lab was full of experts who were willing to help to no end. This, to me, was the beauty of the experience. The willingness for people to share their knowledge and pass on their expertise was evident. With this help, it truly felt like anything was possible. I had no idea what I was doing at any given moment, but the people that surrounded me completed me and helped me achieve a final product.

The scarf I made on display at Kent State University

Here are a few takeaways from my first Makeathon/Hackathon experience:

Creation is amazing: conceiving something, putting in the work and seeing it come to be is extremely rewarding. It’s always a learning experience because unforeseen obstacles always arise.

Focus is powerful: You’d be amazed at how much you can accomplish in a few focused hours that you devote to a single project.

You have more time than you think you do: We’re all busy. No one feels like they have free time and newsflash: you’re never going to feel ready to start something new! (For more on that, check out this Ted Talk.) You need to set time aside in the future to get out of your comfort zone and you will not regret it.

More people need to try this! I’ve come back to campus with a renewed enthusiasm for encouraging innovation on here at University of Delaware.

Overall, the Hackathon/Makeathon environment was incredibly inspiring. Not only was I able to create something, but I was able to witness everyone around me turn their ideas into reality. I feel gifted to have had this opportunity to travel and learn from so many talented people.

Thank you to all that made this possible and I’m looking forward to Delhack this weekend!

Zachary_Jones_Headshot_Square_small.jpegWritten by Zack Jones, University of Delaware
Zack Jones is studying entrepreneurship and technology innovation at the University of Delaware. To learn more about him and his priorities for campus, click here:

Tags: UIF Events

Just Kent Get Enough

20150421_11001120150421_110401We woke up on a sunny, yet windy day at the Kent State University Hotel. The downtown area of Kent, Ohio, is fairly new, having been recently developed (in roughly the last 5 years or so). The streets are wide, the buildings are low and a nice sandstone color with red accents from awnings to roofs. It is a very beautiful town.

As we turned the corner from the hotel, we could see one of the main entrances to Kent State’s campus. A beautiful green pasture sprawled before us, with a sign arching over the sidewalk reading Kent State University. We had officially arrived.

We had a wonderful tour the Fashion School, including the Textile Lab and fashion library. The Textile Lab houses a laser cutter, 3D printers, full-body scanners and more. We also had the opportunity to see the touring Wardrobe Truck, a truck fully stocked with affordable, well-designed clothing.

After the Fashion school, we made our way to the Blackstone LaunchPad, housed in the center of the Student Union. The prominent position of the LaunchPad is a pretty telling statement about the strategic importance of entrepreneurship at Kent. “Through meetings, mentoring, workshops and events LaunchPad helps create new businesses or grow existing start-ups in Northeast Ohio,” for students, faculty, staff and alumni. Blackstone LaunchPad is a pop-up space with a beautifully designed 3D-printed piece in the front. 20150421_12152420150421_121710

We were able to attend our 2nd pinning ceremony with the Fellows at Kent State: Robin Bonatesta, Matthew Allen, Tapti Saha and Sravan Kumar. The room was packed – with almost 30 students, faculty, deans, administration and the associate provost for academic affairs. Faculty sponsors, J.R. Campbell and Julie Messing provided a wonderful introduction of the Fellows and Humera Fasihuddin (co-lead of the University Innovation Fellows program), who provided a detailed introduction of the Fellows program. The Fellows, in great detail, spoke to their experience through training, two regional meetups and the annual meetup. They also discussed the projects they were involved in and the change they were making on the Kent State campus. The largest, and most fruitful event to date, is Kent Hack Enough and the Fashion / Tech Hackathon (wearable fashion technology).20150421_150921-1

The Fashion / Tech Hackathon is held in the main campus library. The Kent State library provides the hackathon with access to three floors: one for food and drinks, one for co-working space and one for napping. Yes; napping. The Kent State hackathons run for 48 hours. The library is a great, modern space with modular furniture, access to Starbucks (café and vending machine) and a Student Multimedia Lab. The Student Multimedia Lab includes additional tools such as 3D printers, 3D pens and leap motion software.

Our final stop of the day is HacKSU. HacKSU is student-run group that manages Kent Hack Enough and also meets weekly to practice coding. HacKSU is lead by Fellow Robin Bonatesta and her colleague, Paul Dilyard. Each week they teach a coding topic. Each topic is additive to the week before. They also blog about the topics taught on the popular forum, (@PaulDilyard, @RobinBonatesta). It was really easy, as a new learner, to walk into this meeting, join the community and have them help set you up in the topic they were covering.

There is so much activity surrounding innovation and entrepreneurship at Kent State University. We are excited for the enhancements that will continue to occur within their I&E ecosystem.

Read all posts in this series here:

UIF Roadtrip April 2015

Virginia is for Makers

Just Kent Get Enough

UIF Roadtrip April 2015

7 Days. *5 Campuses. 25 Fellows.

Picture of Ford Expedition

Follow #uifellows for LIVE updates!

Saturday, April 18th, 2015

Humera and Katie are hitting the road, traveling through eight states to visit University Innovation Fellows, faculty sponsors and administrative leadership, to experience their spaces of innovation and hear stories of the way in which student engagement is expanding opportunities for peers and creating lasting institutional change.

First stop is James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Virginia, where Fellows are holding Bluestone Hacks, the first-ever student led hackathon. Innovative students are prompted to hack solutions to real issues over 24 hours. We’re excited to judge ‘food and agricultural’ innovations, and view team projects in the ‘healthcare’ and ‘consumer devices & tools’ categories.

Next stop — Richmond, VA, to visit our University of Virginia Fellows. Our venue is the infamous Tom Tom Festival which we’ve heard about for years from Elliot Roth, a Fellow from Virginia Commonwealth University. There, we’ll be crashing the Genius Hour, “a showcase of interactive technology with all kinds of innovators, students, creators, tinkerers, hobbyists, engineers and enthusiasts.”

We’ll hit the road again, headed to Kent State in Kent, Ohio, for a walk-through of innovative spaces on campus including their TechStyleLAB, Blackstone Launchpad, Student Multimedia Studio and the Architecture Library. Afterwards, we’ll attend a meeting where Fellows present their experiences and plans to campus administration. We’ll end our time at Kent meeting the team at HacKSU, the masterminds behind the growing annual Kent Hack Enough, the Kent State Fashion/Tech Hackathon (which explores the growing wearables technology industry), and many other cool learning opportunities that get Kent-area students excited about making, tinkering and engineering new and creative innovations.

Heading back East, we’ll hit Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where Fellows at the University of Pittsburgh have a strong partnership with numerous innovative faculty. Our first Fellow, Karuna Relwani (who has since graduated), tells the story of the early days when she and her student colleagues worked to form the ESMD Club (Engineers for Sustainable Medical Development). Now, the program has grown substantially, has systematized its organizational structure (currently on its third President), expanded into a new space which is staffed by an Innovation Director, and has undertaken a beautiful rebranding with the name Pitt DesignHub.

Our trip may include some surprise stops along the way in PA, NY and CT, so be sure to stay tuned with LIVE tweets, photos and video right here on this page!

Hittin’ the road!

Humera and Katie

**Updated 5/5/15: Our surprise stop was to La Salle University in Philadelphia, Pa., making this a 5 campus-tour. (Posts coming soon)

Read all posts in this series here:

UIF Roadtrip April 2015

Virginia is for Makers

Just Kent Get Enough